‘nuisance legal actions’

‘http://host.madison.com/wsj/business/health-of-patent-system-one-of-many-topics-left-out/article_62ae67d8-16c2-5e9d-83fc-fb5b2bc73de7.html

‘nuisance legal actions’

All these overwrought and fictionalized accounts of ‘nuisance legal actions’, weak patents and ‘trolls’ have been used by large multinationals as a pretense to make changes to the patent system so they can rob and crush their small competitors -legalize theft. They could easily spend thousands themselves to remedy if they truly exist, but instead they chose to spend millions to lobby Congress with a propaganda machine that the Chinese and Russians are jealous of.

Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is. Don’t believe the lies of thieves.

As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’. Those who use the amorphous phrase ‘patent troll’ expose themselves as thieves, duped, or doped and perpetuate the lie.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘Silicon Valley cabal’

‘http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/10/25/efficient-infringement-arrived-hill/id=74131/

‘Silicon Valley cabal’

We think cabal is a good term to use when describing the alliance of large multinationals to gut the American patent system and legalize theft of their small competitors’ technologies. But the cabal extends beyond tech. They truly are a cabal of infringers (thieves).

‘far less than the costs of fighting’

‘http://www.wsj.com/articles/americas-biggest-filer-of-patent-suits-wants-you-to-know-it-invented-shipping-notification-1477582521

‘because the amounts are far less than the costs of fighting’

What large infringers who we expect are behind these slanted PR propaganda ‘articles’ don’t tell you is that these settlement amounts are often far less than what infringers would have to pay if the patent holders won in court. But because of changes in US patent law since the ebay SCOTUS decision and others such as AIA, Alice, etc inventors really have no fair chance at commercializing, or enforcing so they are forced to settle for what they can get rather than risk almost certain defeat in a patent system where it is now far too slow, expensive and difficult for us to get and enforce our patents. Large multinationals know this far too well…they’re the ones who caused all this chaos and complete disregard for property rights. All these changes have done is legalize theft of our inventions. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is. Don’t believe the lies of thieves.

‘challenge of patent quality’

‘http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/technology/302593-the-importance-of-issuing-high-quality-patents

‘challenge of patent quality‘

That is simply not true. The problem is the patents that aren’t issued, not the patents that are. Don’t believe the lies of large multinational invention thieves and their propaganda machine. We have a good idea what side of this the author works for. Just take a look at their site.

Insurance “Law Firm of the Year”

It’s not unusual for former government employees to leave public service for industry and lobbying for. We ask, are there those who work for large corps while they’re still in public service?

Talk with any seasoned inventor or their attorneys and you’ll get the same answer. The patent system for us is in crisis. It’s too hard, expensive and slow for us to get and enforce our patents. Many of us now find ourselves in a protracted fight of 10 years or longer with the patent office to even get our patents. Unfortunately, seldom can we afford that. If we have to fight to get our patents, we go out of business. Even if we are lucky enough to get a patent from a patent office ran by managers we regard as overtly partial to our large infringers, it is nearly impossible for us to assert as we in short measure end up back at the PTO where we now have to fight to keep our patents and are thereby deprived our our right to a trial by jury for our most valuable asset…our invention. If we have to fight to keep our patents, we go out of business. Just because they call it “reform” doesn’t mean it is.

The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will…patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. It’s a pure red herring by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’. Those who use the amorphous phrase ‘patent troll’ expose themselves as thieves, duped, or doped and perpetuate the lie.

‘changes to U.S. Patent Law’

‘http://watchdog.org/279314/patent-system-economy/

‘dire implications of continuing changes to U.S. Patent Law’

Unless those changes truly restore the patent system and complete the vision of America’s founders. We’ve had enough of the fraudulent ‘reforms’ of large multinational infringers which are in fact legalized theft.

‘Gary Shapiro is president…’

‘http://fortune.com/2016/10/20/trump-clinton-third-debate-vegas/

‘http://fortune.com/tag/2016-presidential-race/?iid=sr-link3

‘her vow to crack down on patent trolls’

from the site–

Gary Shapiro is president and CEO of the Consumer Technology Association (CTA)™, the U.S. trade association representing more than 2,200 consumer technology companies

Ahhh, the author works for an industry group who inventors will tell you is just a cabal of thieves. Don’t believe their Chinese style propaganda.

‘relying on trade secrets’

‘relying on trade secrets, often as part of a multi-pronged IP strategy alongside patents, trademarks and copyrights’

Trade secrets are already protected by state law. The problem is patents have been so watered down that they are effectively unenforceable, even if we can get them -certainly for inventors and small entities. Far more often in this era we go bankrupt before the PTO comes through for us. Even large multinationals are having trouble enforcing them. Trade secrets do nothing for the public exchange of ideas so one may build on the work of another. Anyone know how to make a Stradivarius violin?

‘Lies, Damn Lies and Media Bias’

‘http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/10/13/fortune-misrepresents-ftc-report-patent-assertion-entities/id=73768/

‘Lies, Damn Lies and Media Bias’

Actually, the large majority of these one sided pro invention infringer (thief) articles are not written by reporters, but by parties who work for infringers -PR, lobbyists, etc., who masquerade as reporters. Read the by lines. They are plants who are paid to spread infringer Chinese style propaganda.

from the FTC report…

“In the Commission’s view, a label like “patent troll” is unhelpful because it invites pre-judgment about the societal impact of patent assertion activity…”

We believe the Chinese style propaganda ‘troll’ campaign by large multinational infringers (thieves) is wholly an effort to obscure the fact of their theft. It is a pure red herring.

The dialogue needs to be put on a proper course. This is not a matter of ‘societal impact’. It is a matter of property rights. As James Madison noted in Federalist No. 43 , ‘The right to useful inventions seems with equal reason to belong to the inventors.’ It is that simple. Those who steal should be punished. Those who steal millions upon millions, or on a grand scale should be punished on a grand scale, including prison. It is a gross inequity when competitors who illegally access your company information will go to prison, but when they steal your technologies, often your most valuable assets by far, not only do they not go to prison, but more often than not they are never punished in any way -certainly, not today. That is grand bias in the law. When thieves write the laws or influence them, America loses.

‘the STRONG Act, is not really patent reform’

‘http://www.patentprogress.org/patent-progress-legislation-guides/patent-progresss-guide-patent-reform-legislation/

‘A Senate bill, the STRONG Act, is not really patent reform…’

plain English translation: this bill will not help us rob and crush our small competitors like AIA and all the others we have bullied or swindled into or through Congress

The truth is Strong is far more nearly reform by any honest definition (and it may get better) than AIA and all the others you reference which only legalize theft of small entity inventions and so they are the opposite of reform -they only make things worse by legalizing theft. Strong at least starts on the right foot and we are hopeful that when complete it or a similar bill will truly restore the patent system which is now wobbling mightily for small entities. Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their Chinese style propaganda machine. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

‘manifestly undeserving claims…’

‘http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-patent-trolls-20161011-snap-story.html

“examiners issue patents for manifestly undeserving claims”

All this reporter knows about patents is…he doesn’t have any. You’ll notice their site does not have a comment section for articles. Are they trying to block open public debate?

Talk with attorneys and inventors who have decades of experience and they’ll tell you the exact opposite. It’s not about the patents that are being issued, but rather those which are not. In their view Patent Office management is running the opposite extreme -complicit in unfairly and illegally denying small entities patents and revoking them when they attempt to assert against large infringers. It appears this reporter has been totally bamboozled by invention thieves. We wonder if he would call Edison, Bell and the Wright brothers scourges on poor helpless billion dollar corporate thieves. Then again, maybe he’s just been bribed and writes what he’s paid to. Maybe the Times is part of the corruption. Newspapers back in the 1800’s banded together to destroy inventor Samuel Morse because he wouldn’t play ball with them and cut them a special deal on telegraphs for their papers. Some of America’s biggest crooks have historically been in publishing. Who owns or controls the Times? Did someone pay to have this outrageously one sided piece published?

Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their Chinese style propaganda machine. Just because they call it reform doesn’t mean it is.

	staff on ‘loosening of patenting…
	staff on ‘misused as tools of agg…
	staff on As we have been saying.
	staff on “ruling on patents could…
	staff on “quietly acquired”