‘controversy’

https://fortune.com/2019/10/07/supreme-court-wont-review-apples-506-million-win-in-university-patent-case/?iid=sr-link1

‘faced controversy in the past for its aggressive assertion of its intellectual property’

It was only ‘controversy’ as far as large multinational serial infringers were concerned. In their view the only property rights that should be asserted and enforced are…their own. Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their partners in crime, including pseudo reporters who appear paid by parties reported on who never tell all sides of the issue and spin a web of lies.

We believe the time has come to create a new judicial body with final jurisdiction over patent cases, such as by splitting SCOTUS into sections with a new section and judges who have considerable experience and training in patent law that will be given all patent cases. A one size fits all court does not do the complex field of law justice, certainly not for inventors. All the present system does is legalize theft of our inventions.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to restore the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

Advertisements

The Oyster

As told in Ben Franklin’s Poor Richard’s Almanac, circa 1730’s…

Two men were walking along a road. They happened upon an oyster and soon began arguing over which of them saw it first. They decided to take the dispute to court.

After a lengthy case and trial it was determined the first man would get one half of the shell and the second man the other. The lawyers would get what was in between.

Today for inventors, taking our patent disputes to the courts, especially SCOTUS and the CAFC, has become eerily similar. We get the shell and our infringing competitors and their attorneys get what was in the middle.

We can only conclude those courts hate us and property rights -at least ours.

‘standard business procedure’

In an episode of Agatha Christie’s Poirot (S05E02 – The Underdog, 1993) at 41 minutes, an inventor describes how he was swindled by a corporation who stole his invention after pretending to have an interest in working with him so they could learn his secrets. This, as inventors have learned, is standard business procedure -certainly for large multinational corporations. It is the rule, not the exception. Without a strong patent system to protect America’s discoveries our shores are open to the predations of multinationals who take what they want and dare you to stop them. The present state of patent law permits and even sanctions this type of treachery. It is a national disgrace the founders would have loathed.

Great heft often comes from grand theft.

‘presumption of an injunction’

https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2019/09/12/senate-hearing-stronger-patents-act-highlights-sharp-split-injunctive-relief-ipr-fixes/id=113241/

“The claim that there would be uncertainty [if eBay was struck down] sounds rather odd when we have 150 years, almost 200 years, of patent cases where they applied a presumption of an injunction on the basis that this was a property right.”

We completely agree. Amen!

Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their paid puppets who tell you inventors do not have a right to their inventions, or a right to trial by jury for disputes over them. The truth is readily accessible and inescapably clear, for as James Madison wrote in Federalist No. 43 on the proposed Constitutional recognition of inventor rights, “The utility of the clause will scarcely be questioned. The copyright of authors has been solemnly adjudged, in Great Britain, to be a RIGHT of common law. The right to useful inventions seems with equal reason to belong to the inventors. The public good fully coincides in both cases with the claims of the individuals.”

As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’.

We believe no bill will restore our patent system for inventors that does not:

1. Restore our right to injunctions as the constitution requires and as was the prior standard making them mandatory after a judgment of infringement is entered, absent exceptional circumstances.

2. Restore a broad scope of patentability so that all useful inventions are eligible as the constitution demands and as the founders intended.

3. Restore our right to trial by jury by eliminating all post issue reviews.

Only then can any bill even begin to restore our patent system for inventors so that we will once again will have a realistic expectation we will be able to commercialize our inventions. Our bill includes these and also addresses the most essential of the current problems that inventors face in this patent system which is for us all but dead.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to restore the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘bar or terminate IPR or PGR’

https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2019/09/30/clarity-needed-stronger-patents-acts-approach-validity-determinations/id=114083/

‘Would such cases operate to bar or terminate IPR or PGR under the STRONGER Patents Act?’

We believe any bill which continues the practice of post issue administrative review of patents is fundamentally flawed. All those proceedings do is deprive inventors of their right to a trial by jury in a Constitutionally compliant tribunal. WE believe all such proceedings are repugnant to the clear word and intent of the founders and our inalienable rights to our inventions which those proceedings deprive us of. Our bill will end them and together with our other measures will restore our patent system to where inventors will once again have a realistic expectation we will be able to commercialize our inventions.

We welcome the participation of all our friends in Congress and all stakeholders who accept and respect all our rights as we do theirs.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to restore the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘misapprehensions of law and misleading rhetoric’

https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2019/07/31/patent-heavyweights-take-strong-stance-aclu-anti-patent-reform-statements/id=111764/

‘misapprehensions of law and misleading rhetoric’

In our view no present bill will restore our patent system to where inventors will once again have a realistic expectation to commercialize our inventions, or even appreciably help. We and our friends in Congress are determined to change that with our bill. With hundreds of years of collective experience in patent law and invention we are committed to that goal.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to restore the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘high standard’

https://www.natlawreview.com/article/senate-subcommittee-ip-holds-hearings-swot-stronger-bill

‘Senator Tillis opened the discussion by asserting that the present high standard for obtaining injunctive relief can discourage “patent trolls”’

Dont believe the lies of multinational invention thieves. Do the math…

patent troll=small competitor

Contrary to the Chinese style propaganda of large multinational infringers (thieves), the current standard is not ‘high’. Rather, it is a barrier.

All it accomplishes is blocking inventors from commercializing their inventions. It accomplishes nothing less. Inventors will tell you that is precisely what those responsible for it intended it to do.

Large multinationals have conspired to collapse our patent system and crush us. Inventors no longer have a realistic expectation we will ever be able to commercialize our inventions.

None of  the present bills will change that. Some wont even materially help. Our bill will, undoubtedly. In fact, it will restore our patent system and complete the vision of America’s founders. Our collective experience in patent law and invention of hundreds of years will ensure its accomplishing our lofty goals. We are committed to that and to working with our friends in Congress to meet our common objectives. Our patent system has been ‘reformed’ to death by large multinational thieves and their partners in crime.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to restore the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com