‘My organization…’

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/297329-why-small-businesses-want-congress-to-pass-venue-reform-this

‘My organization…’

Take a look at the site of an org she is aligned with.

http://www.unitedforpatentreform.com/members http://www.unitedforpatentreform.com/aboutourcause/13/Roberta+Hurley

Notice all the large multinationals and trade industry groups? We suspect that if you lift the rock any apparent ‘small business’ will turn out to be a storefront handpicked small entity -only there in an attempt to help the large serial infringers (invention thieves) legitimize their propaganda. Don’t believe the lies of thieves. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will…patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. It’s a pure red herring by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’. Those who use the amorphous phrase ‘patent troll’ expose themselves as thieves, duped, or doped and perpetuate the lie.

For the last several years the Chinese and large multinationals have been ransacking and looting small American entities taking everything they can carry. Those are the same multinationals who when they cant export jobs, import workers and artificially inflate their employed Americans. The fact is, many of the giant multinationals and their puppets who defame inventors in this way themselves make no products in the US or create any American jobs and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so. Invention thieves well know many inventors lack the resources to enforce their patent rights so their only recourse is to sell to or partner with others who do have the resources. Otherwise, large invention thieves just thumb their noses at you and steal at will.

Prior to the Supreme Court case eBay v Mercexchange, small entities had a viable chance at commercializing their inventions. If the defendant was found guilty, an injunction was most always issued. Then the inventor small entity could enjoy the exclusive use of his invention in commercializing it. Unfortunately, injunctions are often no longer available to small entity inventors because of the eBay decision so we have no fair chance to compete with much larger entities who are now free to use our inventions -in other words, steal. Essentially, large infringers now have your gun and all the bullets. Worse yet, inability to commercialize means those same small entities will not be hiring new employees to roll out their products and services. And now those same parties who killed injunctions for small entities and thus blocked any fair chance at commercializing now complain that small entity inventors are not commercializing. They created the problem and now they want to blame small entities for it. What dissembling!

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘an intent to improve patent system’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/09/19/patent-reform-analyst-perspective-aia/id=72788/

‘The America Invents Act (AIA), which had an intent to improve patent system…’

We disagree -at least in part. We believe the large multinationals who drafted the bill never had any doubt about the true affects of it. They knew it would effectively destroy the patent system for inventors and their small competitors. That was their intent from the start. The rank and file of Congress followed their colleagues who they trusted. That trust was violated. We sincerely hope they will never do so again on any matter of such great importance to America’s economy and future.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘More than a decade of court decisions’

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/technology/295924-bills-to-combat-patent-trolls-are-actually-counterproductive#disqus_thread

‘More than a decade of court decisions and patent legislation has completely remade the inner workings of the U.S. patent system’

More than that, these changes have destroyed inventors and allowed our large competitors to rob us in broad daylight. These changes brought on by a concerted Chinese style propaganda campaign by large multinationals has denied us our fundamental and Constitutionally recognized property rights and legalized theft of our inventions. Don’t believe the lies of thieves. Just because they call it reform doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘For inventors, those who create most of America’s new jobs…’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/09/10/america-invents-act-harmed-inventors/id=72551/

‘For inventors, those who create most of America’s new jobs, the America Invents Act (AIA) was the single worst disaster in the 226 year history of the U.S. patent system.’

We agree, it was disastrous for inventors and small entities.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘Julie Samuels is’

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/295542-fixing-why-uspto-issues-low-quality-patents-should-be

Julie Samuels is chair of the board of Engine Advocacy, a research and lobbying entity for startups

Check out their site at…

http://www.engine.is/about/

You’ll notice this …

Michael Petricone
Senior Vice President, Consumer Technology Association

Yes, it’s just another large multinational infringer trade group attempt to appear to be small entities in an effort to flimflam Congress and spread their lies and distortions. Lift the rock and you’ll find them hiding in the shadows behind their handpicked storefront ‘start-ups’. Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their Chinese style propaganda. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘makes the situation worse’

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/293456-creates-act-would-only-create-more-lawsuits

‘sets out to tackle a specific problem and, in the end, makes the situation worse’

We believe the goal of Chinese and large multinational infringers never was to address abuses in the patent system. Instead their goal was to use overwrought or fictionalized accounts as pretense to pass measures that make it easier for them to rob and crush their small competitors. Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their Chinese style propaganda machine. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

 

On “abstract”

A present thorny or even disastrous problem for inventors and all patent holders is that the courts now in light of Alice review patent claims to decide if the invention claimed is “abstract”. Unfortunately, SCOTUS did not define or elaborate so it has left the door open wide and other courts have done the best they could to apply Alice in a manner which has often invalidated patents for inventions those inventors have spent their lives and life’s savings or staked the existence of their companies developing. These decisions are crushing inventors and allowing our large competitors to take our property with impunity.

We believe there is a better way. Initially, in our view even if an invention specified in a patent application has “abstract” elements to it which as the courts have noted all inventions do as all at the initial stage are based upon a novel abstract concept, so long as the invention adequately describes a manner of implementing or utilizing that concept then the invention no longer can be regarded as abstract. It is one thing to claim “fly to the moon”, but if the inventor teaches one skilled in the art how to actually do so then the invention ceases to be abstract and has by any reasonable test met reduction to practice. America crossed that hurdle over a century ago when working models were no longer required to be filed which as many know caused great problems at the PTO as they were running out of room to store them.

But we think there is a more fundamental issue involved here. As we have previously stated in our position statement and on our site over the course of time law evolves and occasionally rather than run true north we end up somewhere off course. We believe the best solution is to when in doubt or when error creeps in always return to the surveyor’s mark. That in this instance is the Constitution. The elegant and simple path the founders began us on so long ago is no less applicable now than is was nearly 250 years ago. Patents should be issued for ALL inventions that promote the ‘Progress of Science’, or are useful. Those are the best surveyor’s mark. We need to return to the original and stop working with imperfect and approximated copies. Eventually a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy becomes so blurry and useless that a masterpiece becomes a poor and crude imitation. As a result, the patent system has become unpredictable and inventor property rights as a practical matter barely exist as patents for us have become far too hard, expensive and slow to get and enforce. In reestablishing the proper test for patentability to be what the founders envisioned we will greatly simplify and improve the predictability and reliability of the patent system and give inventors a fighting chance by respecting their right to the “faculties of their minds”.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com