‘unfairly required for decades’

http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/334548-supreme-court-limits-venue-shopping-for-patent-cases

‘Individuals and businesses in the U.S. have been unfairly required for decades to defend patent suits in far off locales adding cost, complexity and unpredictably to the intellectual property marketplace.’

So say infringers (thieves). The fact is the opposite. When small entity inventors have to sue our large competitors in their backyards where they dominate the economies and can influence the selection or election of judges we have no fair chance of prevailing. If we are robbed by our large competitors in any state where they have a meaningful presence or are doing business, shouldn’t we be able to sue them there? Hasn’t that always been the case in American law with torts? So if a robbery occurs in a given state by someone of another state or country, the state in which the robbery occurred has no recourse and the accused thief must be tried in his state or country? Based on this decision American colonists would still be be transported and tried in England. That brings to mind a colonist grievance from the Declaration of Independence…

‘For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States’

It now appears large multinational thieves are similarly being protected, enabling them to rob us with impunity. So our large multinational competitors can now come to our state and rob us then force us back to their state or country to sue them? By what sensible doctrine is that just? Thomas Paine wrote in Common Sense “government is at best a necessary evil”.

But what is patent infringement, if not theft? Inventions are property AND the first object of government is to protect them. So said America’s founders. All such court decisions relegate inventions to second class property, at best, and encourage if not legalize their theft. Does America need another war of in dependence…from SCOTUS? These are the sort of decisions that make a growing number of Americans believe appeals in patent cases to SCOTUS should be ended. Do they know what they are doing? Have they been infiltrated by the propaganda of thieves?

All these decisions do is make it easier for our much larger competitors to rob and crush us. Show us a country with weak or ineffective property rights and we’ll show you a country with high unemployment and a weak economy. Congress must now act to restore property rights in America. When thieves win America loses.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘Dangerous New Breed of Patent Troll’

http://fortune.com/2017/05/11/blackbird-patent-troll/?iid=sr-link1

‘Dangerous New Breed of Patent Troll’

what they say: patent troll

what it means: small competitor

The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will…patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. It’s a pure red herring by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’.

We would leave our comment on their site, but they do not allow. Is Fortune and that author reporting, or spreading big business propaganda and stifling open public debate?

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘America’s absurd compulsory licensing patent system’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/05/16/patent-policy-experts-bemoan-americas-absurd-compulsory-licensing-patent-system/id=83264/#comment-2739850

‘America’s absurd compulsory licensing patent system’

It’s true. When government permits one party to take the private property of another against their will they sanction and legalize theft. Whatever happened to rule of law? Selective enforcement of property rights is no property rights at all. Property is property.

Show us a country with weak or ineffective property rights and we’ll show you a country with a weak economy and high unemployment. Sound familiar?

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘big companies and capital markets all eager to license technologies’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/americas-miracle-machine-is-in-desperate-need-of-well-a-miracle/2017/05/05/daafbe6a-30e7-11e7-9534-00e4656c22aa_story.html?utm_term=.2b06b472b196

‘big companies and capital markets all eager to license technologies’

what they really mean: big companies like us never take a license and use our fortune to run small competitors into the ground should they try to assert a patent against us

The truth is large multinationals never take a license and rarely ever have. There’s a reason why small entity issued patents and filed applications have plummeted to about 1/10th of their historical levels. In this current climate of troll propaganda and severely weak or barely existing property rights even large companies have trouble asserting patents. Inventors and small entities simply have no fair chance at commercializing any more. For us the patent system is truly in crisis, if not dead.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘As three entrepreneurs …’

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/330897-congress-protect-businesses-like-ours-from-abusive-patent-trolls

‘As three entrepreneurs …’

We checked the Patent Office web site and no patent has ever issued to any “Austin Meyer”. We expect the same for the other 2 in this piece. So it appears they are not inventors, but may well be unauthorized users of the inventions of others, which would make them…thieves? We’ve seen this sort of chicanery from large infringers before who prop up cardboard small entities talking about the evil ‘trolls’,  which is just code for small competitors.

The truth is the patent system is now a sport of kings, if not thieves, as patents for inventors and small entities are now too hard, slow and expensive for us to get and enforce so our large competitors are now free to steal at will: and they are. Don’t believe the lies of large multinational infringers (thieves) and their Chinese style propaganda machine. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘Today we are facing a crisis’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/03/27/health-american-patent-system-crisis/id=80720/

‘Today we are facing a crisis’

We agree and have said the same. Inventors and small entities no longer have a fair shot at commercializing our inventions. It is now too hard, slow and expensive for us to get and enforce patents for our inventions. The patent system is now a sport of kings, if not thieves.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

Intellectual Property – Driver of Innovation

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/intellectual-property_driver-of-innovation-making-our-lives-healthier-safer-and-more-productive

We are encouraged by and applaud the remarks of some members of the cmte. However, when other members speak of the need for strong patent protection, but then introduce or express support for bills that only weaken patents and the invention rights America’s founders sought to protect, it is clear there is much work to be done to counter the influence and misinformation of large multinational infringers (thieves) and the damage their propaganda campaign has inflicted on property rights in America. These same members speak reverently of our founders, but yet ignore what they teach: the FIRST object of government is the protection of the product of our mental labors such as inventions, discoveries and creations, or as Madison called them our ‘faculties’ (see Our Position for Madison’s Federalist Paper quotes). What are we to make of such behavior? Have they come to praise the founders, yet bury inventors?

For example, some members and witnesses speak of concerns about patent trolls and weak patents used to extract cash settlements. But we have already repeatedly dispelled the patent troll myth…

https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/2017/02/23/successful-patent-trolls/

https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/trolls-also-known-as-non-practicing-entities/

https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/2016/06/14/troubling-pattern-of-associating-universities-with-so-called-patent-trolls/

Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their Chinese style propaganda machine.

We must point out that none of the witnesses at the hearing were inventors or small businesses who rely heavily on patent protection, unlike our large competitors who are able to protect their markets by their size alone. Why does Congress keep stacking cmte hearings with large infringer witnesses and lock out legitimate inventors and small entities who rely heavily on patents to commercialize our inventions? Why are some in Congress so afraid of inventors? Are they trying to hide the truth from the public that for us the patent system is all but dead so they can continue to push for laws that only further crush us and legalize theft of our inventions by our large competitors? Is this all about plausible deniability? Are these members of Congress who repeat the propaganda of thieves about ‘trolls’ and ‘weak’ patents being blackmailed by them or have they otherwise been commandeered? Such one sided hearings only spread the propaganda of thieves and hide the truth.

We believe if you check the federal dockets you will find each of these parties who make these baseless accusations about ‘trolls’ and ‘weak’ patents is routinely far more likely to be a defendant in a patent infringement suit than plaintiff. Like Microsoft who years ago was on record stating they only get patents because their competitors do, these parties are often far more likely to be invention users (thieves) than creators. Sure some of them have quite a collection of patents, but they are patents neither they or anyone else use. It is THEIR patents that are weak or of little value.

Rather, the state of the patent system is the opposite of what infringers say. There’s a reason why small entity patent filings and issued are now running only about 1/10th of their historical level. Clearly, there is something terribly wrong going on here and inventors know what it is: patent are now far too hard, slow and expensive for us to get and enforce and because of all that we are leaving the patent system by the droves. For us the patent system is in crisis.

As to weak patents being used by inventors or small entities to extract cash settlements from businesses…

https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/2016/07/28/invalidating-weak-patents/

https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/2016/07/01/there-are-no-wealthy-countries-with-weak-patent-rights/

https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/2017/04/04/companies-that-hold-patents-but-dont-manufacture/

Again, don’t believe the lies of thieves.

So the fact is all this talk of patent ‘trolls’ and ‘weak’ patents is just a propaganda campaign by large infringers used as pretense to push for changes in law that have nothing to do with the supposed evils they conjure up.  They are red herrings to obscure their repeat and blatant theft of our inventions.

We will continue to expand our introductions to the rest of those in Congress who not only speak support for strong property rights in America, but who are willing to act on it.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com