‘in the judicial district where the defendant resides’

http://thehill.com/policy/technology/overnights/326008-overnight-tech-scotus-hears-venue-shopping-arguments-house-to-vote-on

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/27/business/supreme-court-patent-trolls-tc-heartland-kraft.html?em_pos=small&emc=edit_dk_20170328&nl=dealbook&nl_art=9&nlid=69253745&ref=headline&te=1&_r=1

http://www.inc.com/erik-sherman/supreme-court-could-turn-patent-system-and-business-upside-down.html

“any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides.”

It appears these authors have at least in part used a template for their articles drafted by large multinational infringers -so much so it’s hard to separate fact from the propaganda of infringers (thieves). The Inc article is far more balanced and accurate, but fails to fully navigate their misinformation and dissembling.

It has been tradition in America since its founding and in western society for centuries before and a fundamental axiom, that when a right such as a property right is trespassed the party damaged has a right to sue in any reasonable venue, such as where the crime was committed. To deny inventors the right to bring suit where they are infringed (robbed) and where the infringer has a meaningful tie deprives them of longstanding and traditional American property rights. No doubt our large infringers would rather have their small competitors travel to a distant venue to considerably increase our legal expenses and where their employees or relatives of are on the jury and where they have substantial sway on local courts such as by judge selection. If so, then stay where you are and don’t infringe outside of your home venue. But when your infringement wanders outside that limited boundary then you deserve what you get. When thieves win America loses. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘stand with innovators’

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/lawmaker-news/325673-congress-must-stand-with-innovators-against-patent-trolls’

‘stand with innovators’

Wait a minute…how can they be the ‘innovators’ if someone else owns the patents? Huh?? Doesn’t that make the others the innovators/inventors? If the others are the true innovators, then these people must be the true…thieves?

Look at the byline of the author…

Katie Johnson is the general counsel for the National Association of Realtors

So this is just another big business trade group spreading ‘alternative facts’. Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their Chinese style propaganda machines. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘companies that do little or no business’

https://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2017/03/macrosolve-donald-trump-jr-patents/

‘debate in the tech industry over “patent trolls,” companies that do little or no business other than filing patent lawsuits’

So say large multinationals businesses who do little or no business that isn’t the result of grand theft.

That we sue is because our large multinational competitors have stolen our inventions and forced us out of business with their greater capital. They then have our gun and all the bullets. We either shrink away quietly, or fight like hell. When thieves prosper America loses.

When a writer such as Mullin repeatedly writes one sided pieces in defense of theft we have to ask…who are he and his publication working for?

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘rampant copying’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/03/09/silent-spring-patents/id=79319/

‘Unfortunately, due to the actions of some of the large corporations, the value of these patent assets has diminished greatly over the past decade, along with the survival of many small companies relying on those patents for protection against rampant copying.’

‘copying’…otherwise known as theft

For inventors and many small entities, the patent system is worse than that. It is now too hard, expensive and slow for us to get and enforce our patents. We no longer have a fair chance at commercializing, or fairly benefiting from our inventions -if at all. Large multinational infringers have so bamboozled or commandeered some in government that they can’t tell the robbers from the robbed.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘legitimate patent enforcement’

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/322444-the-importance-of-balanced-patent-policy

‘Those of us that want sound and lasting patent reform must be cautious that the pendulum doesn’t swing too far and hurt legitimate patent enforcement…’

Can you say ‘dissemble’?

plain English translation: it’s “reform” when we can get and enforce our patents, but not when our small competitors can

So patent enforcement is ‘legitimate’ only when they are enforcing THEIR patents??

Don’t believe the Chinese style propaganda of large multinational infringers (thieves) and their paid puppets. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘limit patent trolls’ ability…’

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/260807-stop-patent-trolls-from-holding-american-businesses-hostage

‘limit patent trolls’ ability to victimize innovative, job-creating enterprises’

plain English translation: make it easier for us to rob and crush our small competitors

Sure they create jobs…overseas. Meanwhile, they destroy the ability of their small competitors to do so in America. Don’t believe the lies of thieves. Just because they call it reform doesn’t mean it is.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘loosening of patenting standards’

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/economy-budget/321034-trump-team-fails-to-grasp-the-nature-of-regulatory-burden

‘At the same time, a loosening of patenting standards in recent decades has led to an almost fivefold jump in the number of patents issued annually. The result has been  the creation of a legal minefield for innovators, while patent “trolls”, who live off harassment litigation, have a field day.’

Take a look at this org’s Board…

https://www.cato.org/board-of-directors

Are they just another big business lobbyist group masquerading as a public interest group? It appears so to us. All they know about patents is…they don’t have any.

For example, notice how many have connections with large multinational corps? The truth is the small entity share of issued patents, according to a recent sampling of the PTO’s web site, has shrank to about 1/10th of it’s historical level. The reasons? It is now too hard, expensive and slow for inventors to obtain and enforce patents for our inventions.

Also, the number of patents issued has always increased annually. In fact, for over 100 years (since 1900) the number of patents issued has increased at about 3 times the population percentage increase, which seems reasonable considering the steady migration of the American economy from agriculture to technology.

http://www.multpl.com/united-states-population/table

https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/issuyear.htm

year iss’d pats pop (mils)
2016 301,325 321.93
1986 71,741 240.13
ratio 4.20 1.34
1900 23296 76.09
ratio to 2016 12.93 4.23

So, to use (with intent to mislead?) the historical trend to conclude patents are now too easy to obtain is simply unsupported by the data or reason. Patents do not impede innovation, only theft of. The true ‘innovators’ are the inventors who create the technologies that patents issue for -not the large multinationals and their PR puppets who spin a web of lies and distortions with the aim of stealing them and covering up that theft.

Don’t believe the lies of large multinational infringers (thieves) and their Chinese style propaganda machine. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com