May 2019 – American Inventors for Justice

‘achieved its goals’

‘https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2019/05/21/a-groundswell-of-support-for-strengthening-patent-rights/?slreturn=20190429130459

‘Ultimately, the AIA largely achieved its goals’

Sure it did. It helped legalize invention theft as have many SCOTUS decisions beginning with eBay v Mercexchange in 2005. That was the true goal of that bill in our view as spearheaded by the world’s largest serial infringers -thieves. The reality of all this is simple. Do the math.

patent troll=small competitor

All these changes have done is make it harder, slower and far more expensive for inventors to get, keep and enforce our patents. Now our large competitors just rob and crush us at will. Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their paid puppets. Meanwhile they ship more and more American jobs overseas. When they cant export jobs they import workers that displace Americans. Great heft comes from grand theft.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to restore the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘a total of 63 granted’

‘http://fortune.com/2019/05/14/an-uptick-in-patents-from-historically-black-colleges/?iid=sr-link1

‘Morehouse School of Medicine currently holds the most patents of any HBCU with a total of 63 granted between 2000 to 2019.’

It is both amusing and bewildering to us that that they look at such a small corner of the picture and ignore the entirety -that small entity patents have plummeted to only about 10% of their historical share. They focus on a possible minuscule silver lining and ignore a man made disaster of immense proportion. Meanwhile, they fail to publish the most essential facts such as that neither they or most any inventor or small business can enforce our patents which can take us many years of fighting the Patent Office to get, or even keep if we try: make that years fighting or bankruptcy -whichever comes first.

Is this reporting or PR? We guess it is PR as the article includes no comment section. Open public debate is the last thing they want to pay for.

They almost certainly are not able to commercialize them even if they have commercial potential. Neither can we ours. All theirs and our patents are most often good for is wallpaper. The patent system is a disaster for us and almost certainly for them. They and we spend hundreds of thousand for a patent we cant do anything with.

Why do they not report the facts? Who funds them? Who decides what to cover and how? Are they controlled by the same large multinationals that in our view commandeered our patent system and use it to legalize theft of their small competitors technologies? Was this piece paid for? Is this big business propaganda trying to obscure or hide reality?

“I don’t think I should help lead the sheep to slaughter.”

‘https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2019/05/09/independent-inventors-uspto-underrepresented-patent-system/id=109109/

“I don’t think I should help lead the sheep to slaughter.”

Exactly. This patent system is worthless for many inventors. It is far too hard, expensive and slow for us to get, keep and enforce our patents. We simply have no realistic expectation we will be able to commercialize our inventions. The only way forward in our view is for Congress to pass our bill. Only then will inventors return to the patent system.

‘never ending shell game of patent law’

‘https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/03/19/704763681/sex-empathy-jealousy-how-emotions-and-behavior-of-other-primates-mirror-our-own

At 26:40 the segment describes an experiment where one monkey is given a grape and another a piece of cucumber as a reward for performing the same task. In a similar vein, inventors are given a task which for us is far harder to perform than our large competitors because they are far better capitalized -often as a result from having stolen our inventions. The task has thus been engineered, orchestrated and manipulated by our large competitors so as to give them an advantage. We both jump through hoops, but ours have been set on fire. Not surprisingly, like the monkeys who were treated unfairly, inventors are refusing to participate in the never ending shell game of patent law. That explains why our small entity issued and filed patent applications have plummeted to only about 10% of their historical shares -if not less and still falling.

For example, in the present system our issued patents are subject to admin review at the PTO. But just one of those proceeding can cost us up to $1 million which we seldom have the money to pay and thereby lose by default and our patents can be challenged in multiple such proceedings. Obviously, our patents we fight and claw for years to obtain are in ever present danger. Except for our bill, no other bill adequately addresses this fatal inequity in the law, or many others inventors are now faced with.

‘were worth hundreds of millions of dollars’

‘https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/439075-housecanary-case-reveals-broader-problems-with-intellectual-property

‘were worth hundreds of millions of dollars’

Truthfully, courts will always struggle with determining a reasonable royalty. That is not their forte. That’s why we believe the best policy, as was previously the court standard in patent cases prior to the disastrous eBay decision, is to once infringement is found issue a permanent injunction against further infringement. That way it becomes a simple business decision between the parties, freeing up limited court resources for the rest of their docket. If the parties are unable to come to a settlement going forward, then the court can intervene and impose a settlement for past damages and the injunction will remain in place. If the infringer wants to continue using the invention, they will pay what is demanded. If not, then the parties will go their separate ways.

To allow infringers (thieves) to go unpunished -to allow them to keep their stolen property is outrageously unjust. It is egregiously unfair. How can any government who wishes the respect of its citizens behave in such a way? Eventually, they will not be respected and will be replaced. It is only a matter of time. The people will not stand for a government (jurists, legislators, etc) so completely unfair. They will be turned out and they will completely deserve it. We will do our part to ensure they are.

Who is this org that wrote this article? Who funds and controls them? Who are their directors? Their web site does not say. It appears to us it is the same group of large multinational infringers who pose as public interest groups to help them legalize theft of their small competitors inventions. Lift the rock and see what crawls out.

We agree there are problems with the intellectual property system -certainly patents, but we disagree with the tone of the article that IP rights have gone too far. The truth is the opposite. For us it is far too hard, slow and expensive for us to get, keep and enforce our patents. The result is our large multinational competitors have their way with us. They have since eBay. They rob and steamroll us. Meanwhile, they move more American jobs offshore. When they can’t export jobs, they import workers who displace Americans.

	staff on “quietly acquired”
	staff on ‘out in front’
	‘admissions of… on ‘seriously defective…
	‘STRONGER Pate… on ‘Industry funding of uni…
	staff on ‘inhibit innovation…