‘brandish patents’

http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/05/26/justices-jangle-nerves-in-texas-town-that-patent-trolls-built/

‘which make no products but brandish patents to sue companies for infringement’

So say large multinational infringers (thieves) and those they have duped or doped. Is the Post in the tank for thieves?

https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/2017/04/04/companies-that-hold-patents-but-dont-manufacture/

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘expected to help Bay Area companies’

http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/05/25/ruling-on-patent-trolls-expected-to-help-bay-area-companies/#comments

expected to help Bay Area companies’

Sure, expected to help them rob and crush their small competitors. Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their Chinese style propaganda machine. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘a blatant economic and power grab’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/05/25/former-cisco-executive-giancarlo-false-narrative-patent-trolls-patent-reform/id=83704/

‘a blatant economic and power grab’

Lets be clear on this, it’s private property they are grabbing (stealing) which can be worth an immense amount of money. It’s about property and property rights and the legalization of their theft. More importantly, while these large multinationals rob and crush their small competitors by their theft they also forestall any possibility that their small competitors can use their patents to put these thieves out of business with a strategic injunction forcing them out of lucrative markets if not out of business entirely.  That’s what has had these thieves sweating. Still, we are happy to hear some truth and that the ranks of thieves are being broken.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

“ruling on patents could help curb ‘patent trolls’”

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/supreme-court-ruling-patents-help-curb-patent-trolls-heres/

“ruling on patents could help curb ‘patent trolls.’”

But what is a ‘troll’?

As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’. Those who use the amorphous phrase ‘patent troll’ expose themselves as thieves, duped, or doped and perpetuate the lie.

Is NPR receiving funding from or otherwise being controlled by the large multinational infringers (thieves) driving all this propaganda, enabling them to rob and crush their small competitors? We have to wonder. Who’s on their Board? Who are their largest contributors?

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘unfairly required for decades’

http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/334548-supreme-court-limits-venue-shopping-for-patent-cases

‘Individuals and businesses in the U.S. have been unfairly required for decades to defend patent suits in far off locales adding cost, complexity and unpredictably to the intellectual property marketplace.’

So say infringers (thieves). The fact is the opposite. When small entity inventors have to sue our large competitors in their backyards where they dominate the economies and can influence the selection or election of judges we have no fair chance of prevailing. If we are robbed by our large competitors in any state where they have a meaningful presence or are doing business, shouldn’t we be able to sue them there? Hasn’t that always been the case in American law with torts? So if a robbery occurs in a given state by someone of another state or country, the state in which the robbery occurred has no recourse and the accused thief must be tried in his state or country? Based on this decision American colonists would still be transported and tried in England. That brings to mind a colonist grievance from the Declaration of Independence…

‘For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States’

It now appears large multinational thieves are similarly being protected, enabling them to rob us with impunity. So our large multinational competitors can now come to our state and rob us then force us back to their state or country to sue them? By what sensible doctrine is that just? Thomas Paine wrote in Common Sense “government is at best a necessary evil”.

But what is patent infringement, if not theft? Inventions are property AND the first object of government is to protect them. So said America’s founders. All such court decisions relegate inventions to second class property, at best, and encourage if not legalize their theft. Does America need another war of independence…from SCOTUS? These are the sort of decisions that make a growing number of Americans believe appeals in patent cases to SCOTUS should be ended. Do they know what they are doing? Has the court become a safe harbor for thieves? They show no respect for or even recognition of property rights.

All these decisions do is make it easier for our much larger competitors to rob and crush us. Show us a country with weak or ineffective property rights and we’ll show you a country with high unemployment and a weak economy. Congress must now act to restore property rights in America. When thieves win America loses.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘Dangerous New Breed of Patent Troll’

http://fortune.com/2017/05/11/blackbird-patent-troll/?iid=sr-link1

‘Dangerous New Breed of Patent Troll’

what they say: patent troll

what it means: small competitor

The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will…patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. It’s a pure red herring by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’.

We would leave our comment on their site, but they do not allow. Is Fortune and that author reporting, or spreading big business propaganda and stifling open public debate?

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘America’s absurd compulsory licensing patent system’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/05/16/patent-policy-experts-bemoan-americas-absurd-compulsory-licensing-patent-system/id=83264/#comment-2739850

‘America’s absurd compulsory licensing patent system’

It’s true. When government permits one party to take the private property of another against their will they sanction and legalize theft. Whatever happened to rule of law? Selective enforcement of property rights is no property rights at all. Property is property.

Show us a country with weak or ineffective property rights and we’ll show you a country with a weak economy and high unemployment. Sound familiar?

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com