‘So the backlog is coming down…’

http://www.iam-media.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=fbab43a9-1174-40f5-a960-8d3067807030

Sure, for large corps. If one looks at the issued patents you will routinely find that for large corps patents often issue in under 3 years, but for small entities and inventors it takes 5 or more. Inventors will tell you there is bias in the system. We would pull data from the PTO web site, but it is so poorly constructed and managed that the info is not obtainable. One has to wonder if even the PTO KNOWS WHAT IS GOING ON. Inventors will tell you they either don’t care, or are covering up the true state of the system. We need an end to the revolving door in PTO management from large infringers with more transparency and accountability.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘create a new protected class – a giant corporation ‘

http://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/11/welcome-thanksgiving-break.html

‘Is the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) permitted to create a new protected class – a giant corporation – to take private property for public use without any compensation to the inventor…’

Many inventors will tell you SCOTUS, perhaps to a lesser extent the CAFC, many district courts, the PTO, Congress and the White House have protected large infringers. That certainly has been the end result of their actions -so much so that the patent system is now a mockery. The promises made and guaranteed in the Constitution are now hollow and patents are, when you can get them, worthless -even for large corporations. What a mess they have made of things following the lead of large invention thieves and their paid puppets -some in Congress sitting in committees.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘we faced the tough choice of defending ourselves against the frivolous patent claim ‘

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/261352-patent-reform-must-level-playing-field-for-small-businesses

‘As a result, we faced the tough choice of defending ourselves against the frivolous patent claim and risking incurring millions in legal fees, devastating a company just getting on its feet. What makes this experience even more frustrating is that we invested heavily in the development of our own patent explicitly covering our business and products…’

If that is true, then all you have to do is notify the plaintiff and they will cut you lose or risk penalties from the court. These days courts are very quick to dismiss patent suits brought which even hint at being frivolous.

Don’t believe the lies of thieves. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is. Chances are if you lift the rock this defendant is sitting on you will find the same large multinational invention thieves at work -crawling to a dark corner. This is likely a window dressing ‘small entity’ used for affect. If not, a thief is a thief no matter the size.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘provisions that made it more difficult to obtain patent protection in the US’

‘the AIA included a number of provisions that made it more difficult to obtain patent protection in the US’

http://www.ipprotheinternet.com/specialistfeatures/specialistfeature.php?specialist_id=143#.Vldtil6Dlh5

That is the position of filers in many countries and American inventors will tell you that not just AIA but court and PTO changes have in the aggregate made it far harder, expensive and lengthy to get and enforce patent rights. For many inventors and small entities the American patent system is no longer viable. That is why we believe small entity patent filings have appreciably declined. There is data to support that contention…

http://patentlyo.com/patent/2013/02/small-entity-status.html

However, the PTO database accessible on their web site appears poorly constructed and managed so we are unable to extract the underlying data to document there. A series of ill advised political appointments, mostly from large multinational corps, has greatly reduced the confidence inventors have in the Patent Office and its management who to them appear to have become tools for large infringers.

‘common sense reforms…’

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/260807-stop-patent-trolls-from-holding-american-businesses-hostage#disqus_thread

‘common sense reforms that limit patent trolls’ ability to victimize innovative, job-creating enterprises’

plain English translation: change the law so we can rob and destroy our small competitors at will

Don’t believe the lies of thieves. All this patent troll and ‘reform’ talk is mere dissembling by China, huge multinational thieves, and their paid puppets. If you tell a lie often enough and can dupe others to repeat that lie, eventually it is accepted as fact. As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’. Those who use the amorphous phrase ‘patent troll’ expose themselves as thieves, duped, or doped and perpetuate the lie. They have already damaged the American patent system so that property rights are teetering on lawlessness. Simply put, their intent is to legalize theft -to twist and weaken the patent system so it can only be used by them and no one else. Then they can steal at will and destroy their small competitors AND WITH THEM THE JOBS THEY WOULD HAVE CREATED. For the last several years now they have been ransacking and looting small entities taking everything they can carry. Meanwhile, the huge multinationals crafting these lies ship more and more American jobs to China and elsewhere overseas. When they cant export jobs, they import workers.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘Repetition of Junk Science & Epithets Does Not Make Them True’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/11/19/repetition-of-make-them-true/id=63302/

‘they note that “[o]ver six times as many patent lawsuits are filed today as in 1980’

But the law has changed so inventors must now file separate suits instead of naming all their infringers in one suit. Previously one suit could include tens of infringers. Intentional or not (inventors will tell you it is), Bessen and Meurer are misleading. Who paid for their “study”? Often large corps do so -the same large multinationals who have been robbing inventors blind for several years.

All this patent troll and ‘reform’ talk is mere dissembling by China, huge multinational thieves, and their paid puppets. If you tell a lie often enough and can dupe others to repeat that lie, eventually it is accepted as fact. As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’. Those who use the amorphous phrase ‘patent troll’ expose themselves as thieves, duped, or doped and perpetuate the lie. They have already damaged the American patent system so that property rights are teetering on lawlessness. Simply put, their intent is to legalize theft -to twist and weaken the patent system so it can only be used by them and no one else. Then they can steal at will and destroy their small competitors AND WITH THEM THE JOBS THEY WOULD HAVE CREATED. For the last several years now they have been ransacking and looting small entities taking everything they can carry. Meanwhile, the huge multinationals crafting these lies ship more and more American jobs to China and elsewhere overseas. When they cant export jobs, they import workers.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

It’s all thanks to the emergence of the “patent troll”…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2015/11/19/patents-are-supposed-to-encourage-innovation-without-reform-theyll-do-the-opposite/

‘It’s all thanks to the emergence of the “patent troll” — an entity that doesn’t produce things based on its patents but instead uses patents to sue (or threaten  to sue) others for infringing them.’

Don’t believe the lies of large multinational invention thieves. Take a look at this group’s site…

http://engine.is/about/leadership

Their ‘leadership’ includes a rep from the CEA. Inventors will tell you they are little more than a group of thieves and that in reality their pseudo public interest group is fundamentally a PR firm spreading lies and distortions. They say what they are paid to. Just because they say it’s ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

Prior to the Supreme Court case eBay v Mercexchange, small entities had a viable chance at commercializing their inventions. If the defendant was found guilty, an injunction was most always issued. Then the inventor small entity could enjoy the exclusive use of his invention in commercializing it. Unfortunately, injunctions are often no longer available to small entity inventors because of the eBay decision so we have no fair chance to compete with much larger entities who are now free to use our inventions. Essentially, large infringers now have your gun and all the bullets. Worse yet, inability to commercialize means those same small entities will not be hiring new employees to roll out their products and services. And now those same parties who killed injunctions for small entities and thus blocked any fair chance at commercializing now complain that small entity inventors are not commercializing. They created the problem and now they want to blame small entities for it. What dissembling! If you don’t like this state of affairs (your unemployment is running out), tell your Congress member. Then maybe we can get some sense back into the patent system with injunctions fully enforceable on all infringers by all patentees, large and small.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘the overwhelming majority of patent lawsuits were and are filed in Gilstrap’s court’

‘Worse, the rule might as well have been universal, since the overwhelming majority of patent lawsuits were and are filed in Gilstrap’s court’

http://spectator.org/articles/64699/patently-absurd-rule-falls

That’s absolutely false! According to the Justia site 4932 patent cases have been filed thus far in 2015. Of those 1309 have been filed with judge Gilstrap presiding. By what higher math is that an ‘overwhelming majority’? Once again invention thieves and their paid puppets are caught in bald faced lies.

As we say, don’t believe the lies of multinational invention thieves and their paid puppets.

http://www.instituteforliberty.org/index.php?submenu=staff&src=gendocs&ref=staff&category=Main

Who funds and controls this pseudo public interest gang? Inventors will tell you if you lift the rock you will find the same giant multinational invention thieves once again crawling for a dark corner.

There’s a reason inventors sue in venues like E TX -it gives them a fair chance of enforcing their rights unlike other venues who shy away from such complex cases and readily transfer them, or are unduly influenced by thieves and their paid puppets like Dolt.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘the reason we have a patent system in the first place is to encourage research and development…’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/11/18/mildly-bullish-on-patent-market-heading-into-2016/id=63213/

‘It’s worth taking a step back and remembering that the reason we have a patent system in the first place is to encourage research and development, which are fixed-cost-intensive propositions. If you don’t have a patent system in place, no one’s going to publish their research, and no one’s going to invest those R&D dollars, because they can’t get a reasonable return and everybody could free-ride off of their efforts by reverse engineering their product and figuring out what path they chose to get to the most efficient solution.’

Why can’t the courts and Congress figure this out? No doubt it is true, but perhaps more profoundly and fundamentally it comes down to basic property rights. As James Madison wrote in Federalist No. 43 regarding constitutionally recognized rights of inventors and that portion of the Constitution as proposed, “The utility of the clause will scarcely be questioned. The copyright of authors has been solemnly adjudged, in Great Britain, to be a right of common law. The right to useful inventions seems with equal reason to belong to the inventors. The public good fully coincides in both cases with the claims of the individuals.”

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

 

Carly Fiorina said, “Watch carefully who is supporting that legislation.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/conservatives-must-reject-so-called-patent-reform/article/2566963

Inventors agree. Thieves cannot be trusted. They will in the end do what thieves always do…steal and deceive.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com