‘successful patent trolls ..

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/02/21/fight-low-quality-patents-commoditized-technology-threaten-innovation/id=78581/

“The most successful patent trolls tend to be those with the sharpest noses for weakness. They sniff out low quality patents and hit legitimate businesses where they’re vulnerable in order to make money without doing the actual work of innovation.”

We have heard the same propaganda so long from large infingers that it has become amusing.

First, what is a patent troll and why wont they define it? As often as they use it and as often as we’ve asked, why haven’t they defined it? We believe the answer is simple -if they don’t define it, they wont have to defend it.

We believe what they really mean is ‘small competitors’. Large infringers would rather not have to deal with us in an honest way nor have to respect our property rights so they create a pure fictional account intended to mislead Congress and the courts with the intent of making it easier for them to rob and crush us in peace. But our inventions are a threat to their market share, especially if we are able to obtain injunctions against them to force them to stop using our inventions and have to compete legitimately and honestly with us. But then, thieves are never legitimate or honest. The bigger the thief, the bigger the theft.We do the work, they steal the byproduct. For them, that’s business as usual and they are just fine with it.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘taken a position on legislative language…’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/02/12/patent-reform-2017/id=78189/

‘That IPO has taken a position on legislative language is quite important given the large corporations that make up the Association.’

No doubt, these issues can be polarizing. On one hand we have large multinationals who are more often infringers and on the other we have inventors and other small entities who rely heavily on their ability to protect their inventions from their large competitors. That’s why most every recent change in law has benefited infringers at the expense of small entities. All those ‘reforms’ have done is legalize theft so our large competitors can more easily rob and crush us. Don’t believe the Chinese style propaganda of thieves. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘which do not make any products themselves’

http://fortune.com/2017/02/08/microsoft-cloud-patent-protection/?iid=sr-link2

‘Companies new to the cloud are vulnerable to non-practicing entities, which do not make any products themselves’

So say the large multinational infringers (thieves) who spread this propaganda. The fact is, many of the giant multinationals and their puppets who defame inventors in this way themselves MAKE NO PRODUCTS IN THE US OR CREATE ANY AMERICAN JOBS and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so. Meanwhile, those same multinationals ship more and more American jobs offshore. When they cant export jobs they import workers.

What is a patent troll? Don’t buy the lies and distortions of Chinese and giant multinational invention thieves.

The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will…patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. It’s a pure red herring by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’. Those who use the amorphous phrase ‘patent troll’ expose themselves as thieves, duped, or doped and perpetuate the lie.

For the last several years the Chinese and large multinationals have been ransacking and looting small American entities taking everything they can carry. Those are the same multinationals who when they cant export jobs, import workers and artificially inflate their employed Americans. The fact is, many of the giant multinationals and their puppets who defame inventors in this way themselves make no products in the us or create any american jobs and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so. Invention thieves well know many inventors lack the resources to enforce their patent rights so their only recourse is to sell to or partner with others who do have the resources. Otherwise, large invention thieves just thumb their noses at you and steal at will.

Prior to the Supreme Court case eBay v Mercexchange, small entities had a viable chance at commercializing their inventions. If the defendant was found guilty, an injunction was most always issued. Then the inventor small entity could enjoy the exclusive use of his invention in commercializing it. Unfortunately, injunctions are often no longer available to small entity inventors because of the eBay decision so we have no fair chance to compete with much larger entities who are now free to use our inventions -in other words, steal. Essentially, large infringers now have your gun and all the bullets. Worse yet, inability to commercialize means those same small entities will not be hiring new employees to roll out their products and services. And now those same parties who killed injunctions for small entities and thus blocked any fair chance at commercializing now complain that small entity inventors are not commercializing. They created the problem and now they want to blame small entities for it. What dissembling!

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

Limits of Government

No doubt, there is a limit to what the federal government can and should do. That is as it should be. But we believe strongly as did America’s founders that the principal object of government, certainly good government, is to protect property rights. That, according to President James Madison in Federalist No. 10, “is the FIRST object of government”. We believe this is a good time for Congress to refocus its direction accordingly.

To that end we believe minimally 3 things must change in the American patent system to stabilize and restore invention property rights and restart the patent system.

First, injunctions must be restored so that once infringement is found an injunction must issue against any infringer. To not do so as is presently the case only encourages theft. That is fundamentally unAmerican and contrary to the rule of law.

Second, a straightforward and predictable rule for what is patentable must be reestablished. Presently, no one knows what is patentable. If inventors and our investors cannot predict what is patentable, we will not invent as we cannot fund our inventions. We believe the founders had it right. As had largely been the law for over 100 years, if an invention is useful or advances the sciences, it should be patentable.

Third, Congress must end all post issue administrative reviews. Such reviews deprive us of our property rights without access to the courts and trial by jury which America’s founders acknowledged as a fundamental right of all Americans and a fundamental safeguard to property and liberty.

Further…

4. Ensure a minimum effective patent term of at least 17 years. Presently as the law is being applied by the PTO inventors commonly receive far less and some nearly no effective patent term after years of fighting the PTO to get our patents.

5. Restore the law so that settlements in the course of litigation are not considered in damages as had been the law for over 100 years. Otherwise, the uncertainty of trial and years of hardship places inventors in an all or nothing game in which they cannot risk any loss at trial so they must at least initially settle at values far below market which presently follows them through all their later commercialization efforts, thereby thereafter substantially depriving them of fair value to their inventions.

6. Provide that patent holders may bring suit in any venue where their patents are infringed and where the infringer has a meaningful connection or presence. This has been the law in America since its founding. To treat invention property different from any other property is unfair and encourages large multinational corps to infringe knowing they can move any action to their home turf where they may have a decided upper hand.

For the rest of our proposed measures and a more complete analysis of the above, please visit our position page at …

https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/about/

‘truly frivolous lawsuits’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/02/01/goodlatte-patent-litigation-reform-copyright-reform/id=77879/

‘truly frivolous lawsuits’

Infringers definition: whenever we are sued for invention theft

Large multinational infringers have so mislead Congress that some can’t distinguish the robbers from the robbed. That’s how they con Congress into passing law that only legalizes theft. There’s a reason why a former President once described a big business delegate as ‘more slippery than an eel and more crooked than a…’.

But it’s about property rights. Do any of us truly own our property  anymore, or will government continue to allow big multinational business to simply take whatever they want to wherever they wish as they are now free to do? Meanwhile, those same multinationals ship more and more American jobs offshore. When they cant export jobs they import workers. That in large measure explains why America cant find a good paying full time job. Is the American dream dead? America’s greatest asset -our ingenuity, our inventiveness is systematically being siphoned off and drained to benefit bigger and bigger multinational corporations who are pushing America headlong into a worst case scenario of ‘too big to fail’. Yet, in the end they will assuredly fail. They must as all human creations are imperfect and will eventually fail. It is not just America’s patent system that is in peril. It is America.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘Trolls, also known as non-practicing entities…’

http://fortune.com/2017/01/31/trump-supreme-court-business/?iid=sr-link1

‘Trolls, also known as non-practicing entities, typically create corporate shells’

What is a patent troll? Don’t buy the lies and distortions of Chinese and giant multinational invention thieves.

The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will…patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. It’s a pure red herring by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’. Those who use the amorphous phrase ‘patent troll’ expose themselves as thieves, duped, or doped and perpetuate the lie.

For the last several years the Chinese and large multinationals have been ransacking and looting small American entities taking everything they can carry. Those are the same multinationals who when they cant export jobs, import workers and artificially inflate their employed Americans. The fact is, many of the giant multinationals and their puppets who defame inventors in this way themselves make no products in the US or create any American jobs and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so. Invention thieves well know many inventors lack the resources to enforce their patent rights so their only recourse is to sell to or partner with others who do have the resources. Otherwise, large invention thieves just thumb their noses at you and steal at will.

Prior to the Supreme Court case eBay v Mercexchange, small entities had a viable chance at commercializing their inventions. If the defendant was found guilty, an injunction was most always issued. Then the inventor small entity could enjoy the exclusive use of his invention in commercializing it. Unfortunately, injunctions are often no longer available to small entity inventors because of the eBay decision so we have no fair chance to compete with much larger entities who are now free to use our inventions -in other words, steal. Essentially, large infringers now have your gun and all the bullets. Worse yet, inability to commercialize means those same small entities will not be hiring new employees to roll out their products and services. And now those same parties who killed injunctions for small entities and thus blocked any fair chance at commercializing now complain that small entity inventors are not commercializing. They created the problem and now they want to blame small entities for it. What dissembling!

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com

‘without burdening industry’

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/uncategorized/317094-trumps-patent-policy-should-put-america-first-not-the-patent

‘But when it comes to helping American workers and domestic industries, we need a balanced patent system. We need one that protects real inventions without burdening industry with silliness like patents on PB&J sandwiches or one-touch scanners.’

plain English translation: Large multinational infringers (invention thieves) need a patent system that blocks small competitors from getting and enforcing patents against them…’burdening them’

Take a look at the authors’ web site:

https://www.publicknowledge.org/about-us/board/

Notice how they are controlled by some of the world’s largest multinationals. Inventors will tell you they are also some of our largest repeat and perennial  infringers. These pseudo public interest groups say and write what they are paid to -just like any big corp lobbyist. Don’t believe the lies of thieves and their paid puppets. Just because they call it reform doesn’t mean it is.

For our position and the changes we advocate (the rest of the truth) to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com
or, contact us at aifj@mail.com