‘their points really don’t justify delaying venue reform’
So say large multinational invention thieves and their paid puppets.
From near the bottom of the “article”…
‘Matt Levy is Patent Counsel at the Computer and Communications Industry Association’
Inventors will tell you this trade group is just a front for large serial infringers. Don’t believe the lies of thieves. Just because they call it reform doesn’t mean it is. We have to ask, did they pay to publish this Chinese style propaganda?
For an honest assessment please see our position statement.
We also encourage you to read the letter by law professors in support of property rights at…
It’s important to point out that of the competing list of academics in support of the venue bill, at least 1 according to that university web site has not been active with the university he is listed as being associated with since July of 2013 -David Levine. How many others are there who similarly may not have a current connection with the schools they are listed with? Are he and others listed with him moonlighting for large multinational infringers? Do they write and espouse the views they are paid to?
For our position and the changes we advocate to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org