May 2016 – Page 2 – American Inventors for Justice

‘take-it-or-leave-it offer’

‘http://fortune.com/2016/05/18/patents-ip3/

‘the owner will receive a take-it-or-leave-it offer’

That’s pretty much the sad state of the American patent system. China and large multinationals have so commandeered it that patents are largely unobtainable and unenforceable. They have legalized theft. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is. Don’t believe the lies of thieves.

For our position and the changes we advocate to truly reform the patent system, or to join our effort, please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/category/our-position/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘drive down pendency’

‘http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/05/17/diversion-uspto-user-fees-tax-innovation/id=69070/?utm_source=Website+Subscribers+%28RSS%29&utm_campaign=c02b456b3f-Daily_RSS_Feed_With_Calendar&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_98774de295-c02b456b3f-72165381

‘impairs the ability of the USPTO to …drive down pendency’

We agree. Affairs at the PTO are bad enough with management inventors believe is a toady for large infringers and the PPAC chocked full of large multinationals and their puppets. As it now stands large multinationals commonly get their patents in under 3 or even 2 years while inventors have to routinely wait 5 or more. Most of us go out of business before we can get our patents. The system has become a disgrace. Pendency, not quality, is the true issue -that and the patents that are not issued that should be. AIA and its expedited processing have made a mockery of the system. AIA must be repealed and new leadership placed at the head of the PTO which has strong ties to inventors and small entities. We must stop placing those with strong ties to large repeat infringers at the top.

‘instead of building their businesses’

‘http://www.barrons.com/articles/patents-can-be-dangerous-to-inventors-welfare-1463197515

‘one finds inventor after inventor who pursued patents, instead of building their businesses’

So say large invention thieves and those they have duped or doped. Without patents inventors become free r&d for large competitors. You build your business only to have them copy your invention and elbow you out of the market you created. Don’t believe the lies of thieves. Think again. Just because they call it reform doesn’t mean it is.

‘opportunity to act on a bill’

‘http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/279714-senator-mcconnell-dont-ignore-kentuckys-small-businesses

‘Congress has the opportunity to act on a bill that would crack down on patent trolls…’

plain English translation: act on a bill that will allow large multinationals to rob and crush their small competitors

For the last several years the Chinese and large multinationals have been ransacking and looting small American entities taking everything they can carry. Those are the same multinationals who when they cant export jobs, import workers and artificially inflate their employed Americans. The fact is, many of the giant multinationals and their puppets who defame inventors in this way themselves make no products in the US or create any American jobs and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so. Invention thieves well know many inventors lack the resources to enforce their patent rights so their only recourse is to sell to or partner with others who do have the resources. Otherwise, large invention thieves just thumb their noses at you and steal at will.

‘Best Address Abusive Patent Practices’

‘http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/05/12/industry-self-regulation-will-best-address-abusive-patent-practices/id=69057/?utm_source=Website+Subscribers+%28RSS%29&utm_campaign=206a84cffa-Daily_RSS_Feed_With_Calendar&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_98774de295-206a84cffa-72165381

‘Best Address Abusive Patent Practices’

All these claims about abusive practices by plaintiffs are overwrought. For example, even when the occasional ‘bad’ patent is issued it will rarely matter. Small entities rely on contingent firms to enforce their rights. Those law firms will go through your patent with a fine toothed comb. If they don’t believe in it, they will not take your case. It’s that simple. In the highly unlikely event they do the courts these days have a quick trigger to dismiss weak cases and will even sanction the parties at fault. No attorney is going to risk that. So this contrived argument of bad patents is a ruse by large invention thieves as a shell game to obscure their theft.

Rather these charges of abuse are pretense by large infringers to justify what they call ‘reform’ which is in truth the opposite. All these proposed changes do is legalize theft and allow them to easily rob and crush their small competitors.

Don’t believe the lies of thieves. Just because they call it reform doesn’t mean it is.

‘The problem…is that it’s neither fair nor balanced’

‘http://legalnewsline.com/stories/510723809-proposed-federal-legislation-aims-at-cracking-down-on-forum-shopping-of-patent-cases

‘The problem with their take on venue revision is that it’s neither fair nor balanced’

Mossoff is right. These bills drafted and promoted by large multinational invention thieves never do what they claim to. What this bill will do is restrict inventors and small entities to suing their large competitors in their backyards where it will take years to get to trial -if ever. That way inventors go bankrupt before infringers can be held accountable for their theft. That’s what these proponents are betting on.

Don’t believe the Chinese style propaganda of large multinationals. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

‘curb the flow of patent infringement ‘

‘http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1329571’

‘VENUE Act aims to curb the flow of patent infringement cases‘

Like AIA, all these bills do is make it easier for large multinational invention thieves to rob and crush their small competitors. Just because they call it ‘reform’ doesn’t mean it is.

‘term employed by leading newspapers…’

‘http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/05/08/media-use-term-patent-troll-negatively-predisposes-readers-courts/id=68944/

‘“Patent troll,” the term employed by leading newspapers, magazines and online publications’

When invention thieves define it, we’ll respond to it.

The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will…patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. It’s a pure red herring by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. Their goal is to legalize theft. For the last several years now they have been ransacking and looting small entities taking everything they can carry. The fact is, many of the large multinationals and their puppets who defame inventors in this way themselves make no products in the US or create any American jobs and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so. Invention thieves well know many inventors lack the resources to enforce their patent rights so their only recourse is to sell to or partner with others who do have the resources. Otherwise, large invention thieves just thumb their noses at you and steal at will. To infringers the only patents that are legitimate are their own -if they have any. Meanwhile, the huge multinationals ship more and more American’s jobs overseas.

‘whether the Patent Office has been too harsh’

‘https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/05/02/why-our-patent-system-ended-up-in-the-hands-of-the-supreme-court/

‘The question in front of the Supreme Court is whether the Patent Office has been too harsh when reviewing patents’

But there is a far bigger question…should the PTO ever have had that power delegated to them? Inventors will tell you HELL no!

There are multiple problems with this. First, inventors do not trust PTO management. For years now they have forced inventors to fight them to get a patent. With the disclosure of the secret SAWS program at the PTO it has all become clear to us. And with the former head of patents for a large repeat infringer who has been a central player in what they call ‘patent reform’ at its helm it becomes even more so. Inventors believe PTO management is not impartial and cannot be trusted, certainly not when it comes to validating patents caught up in litigation. There is a reason why we have the courts.

Beyond due process another issue is that post issue reviews often pit inventors and small entities against large infringers. In court we have access to contingent litigators where we stand a better chance of a fair fight. But at the PTO we do not have that access. It becomes a fight of who can spend the most and naturally the well financed most always win out. Denying inventors the right to judicial review on questions of validity deprives them of their property rights without due process and makes it child’s play for large infringers to steal at will. It’s just not fair.

‘an entirely new system’

‘http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/05/07/patent-reform-101-a-primer-on-pending-patent-legislation/id=57529/

‘The AIA threw out one patent regime and substitute(d) it with an entirely new system.’

Inventors will tell you what it truly did was legalize theft. Just because they called it reform doesn’t mean it was. These present bills are mostly just more of the same, or at least fail to address the problems in the system for inventors and small entities. Don’t believe the lies of large multinational invention thieves and their paid puppets. It’s time for REAL reform.

	staff on “quietly acquired”
	staff on ‘out in front’
	‘admissions of… on ‘seriously defective…
	‘STRONGER Pate… on ‘Industry funding of uni…
	staff on ‘inhibit innovation…