‘the overwhelming majority of patent lawsuits were and are filed in Gilstrap’s court’

‘Worse, the rule might as well have been universal, since the overwhelming majority of patent lawsuits were and are filed in Gilstrap’s court’

http://spectator.org/articles/64699/patently-absurd-rule-falls

That’s absolutely false! According to the Justia site 4932 patent cases have been filed thus far in 2015. Of those 1309 have been filed with judge Gilstrap presiding. By what higher math is that an ‘overwhelming majority’? Once again invention thieves and their paid puppets are caught in bald faced lies.

As we say, don’t believe the lies of multinational invention thieves and their paid puppets.

http://www.instituteforliberty.org/index.php?submenu=staff&src=gendocs&ref=staff&category=Main

Who funds and controls this pseudo public interest gang? Inventors will tell you if you lift the rock you will find the same giant multinational invention thieves once again crawling for a dark corner.

There’s a reason inventors sue in venues like E TX -it gives them a fair chance of enforcing their rights unlike other venues who shy away from such complex cases and readily transfer them, or are unduly influenced by thieves and their paid puppets like Dolt.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘the reason we have a patent system in the first place is to encourage research and development…’

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/11/18/mildly-bullish-on-patent-market-heading-into-2016/id=63213/

‘It’s worth taking a step back and remembering that the reason we have a patent system in the first place is to encourage research and development, which are fixed-cost-intensive propositions. If you don’t have a patent system in place, no one’s going to publish their research, and no one’s going to invest those R&D dollars, because they can’t get a reasonable return and everybody could free-ride off of their efforts by reverse engineering their product and figuring out what path they chose to get to the most efficient solution.’

Why can’t the courts and Congress figure this out? No doubt it is true, but perhaps more profoundly and fundamentally it comes down to basic property rights. As James Madison wrote in Federalist No. 43 regarding constitutionally recognized rights of inventors and that portion of the Constitution as proposed, “The utility of the clause will scarcely be questioned. The copyright of authors has been solemnly adjudged, in Great Britain, to be a right of common law. The right to useful inventions seems with equal reason to belong to the inventors. The public good fully coincides in both cases with the claims of the individuals.”

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

 

Carly Fiorina said, “Watch carefully who is supporting that legislation.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/conservatives-must-reject-so-called-patent-reform/article/2566963

Inventors agree. Thieves cannot be trusted. They will in the end do what thieves always do…steal and deceive.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘Congress took a big step in 2011, when it passed the America Invents Acts’

http://spectator.org/articles/64672/diluting-ebay-standard-will-embolden-trolls

So say Chinese and giant multinational invention thieves and their paid PR puppets -some will say such as Titch. Sure Congress ‘took a big step’: backwards! Don’t believe their lies. Inventors will tell you the opposite. Former Chief Judge of the CAFC Rader describes the Patent Office post grant procedures such as those established by AIA as ‘patent death squads’.

There are many problems with the present state of the patent system (please see our Position Statement). One is the obliteration of injunctions for inventors. Yet the US Constitution and our founders acknowledged the EXCLUSIVE rights of inventors.

From ‘Section 8 – Powers of Congress:
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;’

If we cannot obtain injunctions once infringement is found we have no realistic chance at EVER commercializing our inventions. To attempt without is a fool’s errand. Any rational reading of the Constitution requires that injunctions always be issued once infringement is adjudged, except in rare instances such as where national security is jeopardized. It’s about property rights. Show us a country with weak or ineffective property rights and we’ll show you a country with a weak economy and high unemployment. Is this all starting to sound and look familiar?

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘East Texas is ranked at the top of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute…’

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/15/chuck-muth-draining-the-swamp-of-patent-trolls/

Consider the source. As from wikipedia…

‘ILR is affiliated with the United States Chamber of Commerce, a non-profit trade association lobbying group representing businesses and industry associations’

What is a patent troll? Don’t buy the lies and distortions of Chinese and giant multinational invention thieves.

The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will…patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. It’s a pure red herring by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. As Mark Twain said, ‘truth is not hard to kill, and (that) a lie well told is immortal’. Those who use the amorphous phrase ‘patent troll’ expose themselves as thieves, duped, or doped and perpetuate the lie.

For the last several years the Chinese and large multinationals have been ransacking and looting small American entities taking everything they can carry. Those are the same multinationals who when they cant export jobs, import workers and artificially inflate their employed Americans. The fact is, many of the giant multinationals and their puppets who defame inventors in this way themselves make no products in the US or create any American jobs and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so. Invention thieves well know many inventors lack the resources to enforce their patent rights so their only recourse is to sell to others who do have the resources. Otherwise, large invention thieves just thumb their noses at you and steal at will.

Prior to the Supreme Court case eBay v Mercexchange, small entities had a viable chance at commercializing their inventions. If the defendant was found guilty, an injunction was most always issued. Then the inventor small entity could enjoy the exclusive use of his invention in commercializing it. Unfortunately, injunctions are often no longer available to small entity inventors because of the eBay decision so we have no fair chance to compete with much larger entities who are now free to use our inventions -in other words, steal. Essentially, large infringers now have your gun and all the bullets. Worse yet, inability to commercialize means those same small entities will not be hiring new employees to roll out their products and services. And now those same parties who killed injunctions for small entities and thus blocked any fair chance at commercializing now complain that small entity inventors are not commercializing. They created the problem and now they want to blame small entities for it. What dissembling!

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com

‘I don’t think much of our portfolio is impacted by Alice’

One problem as your guest notes is that the courts haven’t quite figured out how to apply Alice -certainly not uniformly. But the problems with Alice are much more fundamental. In an interview last year retired CAFC Chief Judge Michel stated ‘I don’t know that they really understand what they’re doing’ when commenting on the SCOTUS decision. Inventors will tell you if they know, they’re certainly keeping it a secret. In the end Alice has substantially weakened and for many inventors destroyed the patent system. If we cant enforce patents we spend years fighting the Patent Office for, what’s the point of inventing anything. The rights our founders acknowledged in the Constitution have been, at least for inventors and small entities, obliterated. This is America? Now more than ever inventors need real reform, not the false so called ‘reforms’ of large multinational invention thieves.

For more information please visit us at https://aminventorsforjustice.wordpress.com/
or, contact us at tifj@mail.com